Words matter and the way we use them should be given good forethought, especially when coining a new phrase for others to embrace. One such phrase, social distancing, has become a term seemingly given little thought before suggesting its adoption. Actually, the term, physical distancing, is the better choice of words. The people at Dictionary.com describe the word, “social” as:
–“relating to, devoted to, or characterized by friendly companionship or relations: a social club.
–seeking or enjoying the companionship of others; friendly; sociable; gregarious.
of, relating to, connected with, or suited to polite or fashionable society:
a social event.
–living or disposed to live in companionship with others or in a community, rather than in isolation:
People are social beings…..”
Given their description of the word, social, it stands to reason that, in this technology-driven, COVID-19 world, people will find creative ways to socialize, to connect, to engage, as we all should.
At issue is that we are being told to practice social distancing versus physical distancing which speaks to in-person proximity to one another. To ask people to be socially (emotionally) distant and to stay six feet apart is sending two different messages.
Should we really be asked to disengage, disconnect and stay apart? The answer is critical to understand because, in the presence of this highly contagious virus-filled environment, we need to feel engaged, connected and able to socialize creatively without risk of exposure. On the other hand, when asking that we physically distance at least six feet apart while wearing a mask, we are provided with a greater sense of protection and concern for our lives and those of others we come in contact with.
The point is to be aware of the words being used and the ramifications of those words when put into action. Social distancing is not the same as physical distancing.. In this pandemic world, please exercise physical distancing for the safety of us all.